Edit
Contact us
Salocin Group Leaders in data and AI-enabled connected customer experiences
Edit Engineers of connected customer experiences
Join the Dots Independent, data-led media thinking for sustainable growth
Wood for Trees Optimisers of future fundraising performance
  • Home
  • Our services
    • Cloud solutions
    • Data science
    • Modern Data Platform
    • Privacy and AI compliance
  • Our partners
    • Apteco
    • Creatio
    • Microsoft
    • Salesforce
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Salocin Group
    • Careers
  • Contact Salocin Group
  • Home
  • Who we are
    • B Corp
    • Careers
  • Our work
  • What we do
    • Intelligent data
    • Marketing technology
    • Transformational CRM
    • Our technology partners
    • Privacy review
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • Contact Edit
  • Home
  • Broadcast media
  • Digital media
  • Print
    • Direct mail
  • Data
    • Our work with Herdify
    • EPiC
  • Media agency
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Join the Dots
    • Careers
  • Contact Join the Dots
  • Home
  • Services
    • Actionable insight
    • Data discovery
    • Data engineering
    • Data hygiene
    • Privacy review
  • Products
    • InsightHub
    • Apteco
    • Microsoft
    • Data management
    • Consent and preference management
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Wood for Trees
    • Operating principles
    • Careers
  • Contact Wood for Trees
Blog

Google is killing off Instant Search – so we can (temporarily) feel lucky again

By Edit | 31 Jul 2017

We published this a long time ago…

Some of the content in this post might be out of date, and some images and links may no longer work.

Discover who we are and how we may be able to help you today:

Learn more

What was Google Instant?

Google Instant was a predictive search feature that started to load the search results page as users were entering their search, effectively showing the top results for the autocompleted search query. The feature was introduced in 2010 under Melissa Mayer’s tenure at Google and was predicted (no pun intended) to shave 2-5 seconds from the time it took each user to search.

A Google spokesperson commented to Search Engine Land:

We launched Google Instant back in 2010 with the goal to provide users with the information they need as quickly as possible, even as they typed their searches on desktop devices. Since then, many more of our searches happen on mobile, with very different input and interaction and screen constraints. With this in mind, we have decided to remove Google Instant, so we can focus on ways to make Search even faster and more fluid on all devices.

Loading and reloading a results page every time a searcher types another letter can be an extremely frustrating experience on a mobile, especially on 3G or 4G. It’s bad enough that Google wants to use your location and reloads the whole page if you let it – and that’s only once.

Goodbye, I’m Feeling Lucky

Instant Search also meant the death of the I’m Feeling Lucky button which, although still found next to the Google Search button on Google’s homepage, lost some of its usefulness in 2010 when Google Instant rolled out. Currently a visitor can click I’m Feeling Lucky and get to the Google Doodles page – but previously the button could be pressed instead of the Google Search button to take the user directly to the first organic result. Since Google Instant, the results page has been loaded as soon as the user started to type, so there’s no way to know whether the button would have ever been clicked.

The Inquirer reported that the button’s functionality had been drastically reduced in September 2016.

According to Nicholas Carson, Google estimated in 2007 that 1% of searches went through the I’m Feeling Lucky button, meaning that ads weren’t shown for 1% of all searches, costing Google around $110m in revenue. Based on current trends I’ve estimated that Google will process 2,380,000,000,000 searches in 2020, up from the low hundreds of millions in 2007. Showing 1% more ads (bearing in mind that more of the results returned are now ads anyway) could pay off Google’s EU fine in a year or two.

Google has enough to worry about trying to get ads in front of the 20% of its mobile audience using voice search – there is absolutely no chance that the I’m Feeling Lucky button will still be there at the end of this year.

When Google introduced Instant, Mayer said Google wanted to keep the button because “it’s possible to become too dry, too corporate, too much about making money.”

Mayer doesn’t work for Google anymore.

We published this a long time ago…

Some of the content in this post might be out of date, and some images and links may no longer work.

Discover who we are and how we may be able to help you today:

Learn more

Share this

  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)

More insights

AI isn’t going to take your job (unless you really want it to) 
Blog

AI isn’t going to take your job (unless you really want it to) 

By Edit | 18 Jun 2024
Customer relationship marketing: How generative AI is revolutionising engagement  
Blog

Customer relationship marketing: How generative AI is revolutionising engagement  

By Edit | 4 Apr 2024
Personalisation as a process
Blog

Personalisation as a process

By Edit | 8 Mar 2024
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Ts&Cs
  • Report a concern

© 2025 Edit, part of Salocin Group Ltd. All rights reserved. Company no.: 0362​4881. VAT no.: 4208​34911.

Salocin Group Certified B Corporation | Cyber Essentials Certified | British Assessment Bureau, ISO 27001 Information Security Management
Salocin Group
Your cookie preferences

We use cookies to ensure this website functions properly, to analyse website traffic and for marketing purposes.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}