Edit
Contact us
Salocin Group Leaders in data and AI-enabled connected customer experiences
Edit Engineers of connected customer experiences
Join the Dots Independent, data-led media thinking for sustainable growth
Wood for Trees Optimisers of future fundraising performance
  • Home
  • Our services
    • Cloud solutions
    • Data science
    • Modern Data Platform
    • Privacy and AI compliance
  • Our partners
    • Apteco
    • Creatio
    • Microsoft
    • Salesforce
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Salocin Group
    • Careers
  • Contact Salocin Group
  • Home
  • Who we are
    • B Corp
    • Careers
  • Our work
  • What we do
    • Intelligent data
    • Marketing technology
    • Transformational CRM
    • Our technology partners
    • Privacy review
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • Contact Edit
  • Home
  • Broadcast media
  • Digital media
  • Print
    • Direct mail
  • Data
    • Our work with Herdify
    • EPiC
  • Media agency
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Join the Dots
    • Careers
  • Contact Join the Dots
  • Home
  • Services
    • Actionable insight
    • Data discovery
    • Data engineering
    • Data hygiene
    • Privacy review
  • Products
    • InsightHub
    • Apteco
    • Microsoft
    • Data management
    • Consent and preference management
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Wood for Trees
    • Operating principles
    • Careers
  • Contact Wood for Trees
Blog

How search volume data may be used to determine brand authority

By Edit | 1 Jul 2009

We published this a long time ago…

Some of the content in this post might be out of date, and some images and links may no longer work.

Discover who we are and how we may be able to help you today:

Learn more

This week’s brand update has left a lot of people trying to figure out exactly why Google is boosting the ranking of certain top brands. We know they aren’t boosting sites just because they are owned by a big brand – the boost comes from a number of authority-based ranking factors that Google is giving greater trust to and the net effect of this is that brands are getting better rankings for major keywords.

One of those authority factors is likely to be search volume – if one of the biggest keywords in the travel insurance industry is “post office travel insurance” then Google gives the Post Office a boost for that particular keyword. I would be amazed if Google wasn’t including this data in the authority and relevancy part of the algorithm for major keywords, the only unknown aspect is how much it’s being used.

I’ve been playing around with the Google Trends tool and comparing it to various sectors that have seen a big impact after the brand update – in almost every case the brands that appear in the related keywords are the same brands that received a boost.

Travel insurance – Post Office and Money Supermarket are 1st & 2nd in the search results and also appear in the top & rising searches.

 

Car insurance – Confused.com jumped to 1st position this week and “confused.com car insurance” is the sectors hottest rising term.

Broadband – Virgin Media jumped apparently from page 3(?) to 1st place this week. “Virgin” & “Virgin broadband” are the most popular non-generic keywords in this sector.

Used cars – Auto Trader has jumped to 1st place and is also mentioned in 3 of the top 10 search results.

Credit cards – Tesco, Virgin, MBNA & Lloyds all rank on page 1 and all appear in the top searches

One interesting feature of Google Insights for Search is the regional variations – I wonder how long before Google starts regionalising the search results based on search volumes?

Google uses a number of factors to determine related keywords, one of the main ones is likely to be the keywords searched for in a particular session. For example if I search for “car insurance” and then 5 minutes later search for “confused.com” then the two keywords are probably related. If enough people carry out these searches then Google has to think about moving Confused.com up in the rankings for “car insurance”.

The key takeaway from this theory is that the more people you can get searching for your brand the higher you can rank for your major keywords. In a big industry that might be pretty hard but in a smaller industry the site that becomes a “brand” first could get a major advantage.

We published this a long time ago…

Some of the content in this post might be out of date, and some images and links may no longer work.

Discover who we are and how we may be able to help you today:

Learn more

Share this

  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)

More insights

AI isn’t going to take your job (unless you really want it to) 
Blog

AI isn’t going to take your job (unless you really want it to) 

By Edit | 18 Jun 2024
Customer relationship marketing: How generative AI is revolutionising engagement  
Blog

Customer relationship marketing: How generative AI is revolutionising engagement  

By Edit | 4 Apr 2024
Personalisation as a process
Blog

Personalisation as a process

By Edit | 8 Mar 2024
Read more
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Ts&Cs
  • Report a concern

© 2025 Edit, part of Salocin Group Ltd. All rights reserved. Company no.: 0362​4881. VAT no.: 4208​34911.

Salocin Group Certified B Corporation | Cyber Essentials Certified | British Assessment Bureau, ISO 27001 Information Security Management
Salocin Group
Your cookie preferences

We use cookies to ensure this website functions properly, to analyse website traffic and for marketing purposes.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}