Edit
Contact us
Salocin Group Leaders in data and AI-enabled connected customer experiences
Edit Engineers of connected customer experiences
Join the Dots Independent, data-led media thinking for sustainable growth
Wood for Trees Optimisers of future fundraising performance
  • Home
  • Our services
    • Cloud solutions
    • Data science
    • Modern Data Platform
    • Privacy and AI compliance
  • Our partners
    • Apteco
    • Creatio
    • Microsoft
    • Salesforce
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Salocin Group
    • Careers
  • Contact Salocin Group
  • Home
  • Who we are
    • B Corp
    • Careers
  • Our work
  • What we do
    • Intelligent data
    • Marketing technology
    • Transformational CRM
    • Our technology partners
    • Privacy review
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • Contact Edit
  • Home
  • Broadcast media
  • Digital media
  • Print
    • Direct mail
  • Data
    • Our work with Herdify
    • EPiC
  • Media agency
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Join the Dots
    • Careers
  • Contact Join the Dots
  • Home
  • Services
    • Actionable insight
    • Data discovery
    • Data engineering
    • Data hygiene
    • Privacy review
  • Products
    • InsightHub
    • Apteco
    • Microsoft
    • Data management
    • Consent and preference management
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Wood for Trees
    • Operating principles
    • Careers
  • Contact Wood for Trees
Blog

Penguin 4.0 update now live

By Edit | 24 Sep 2016

We published this a long time ago…

Some of the content in this post might be out of date, and some images and links may no longer work.

Discover who we are and how we may be able to help you today:

Learn more

Google’s Gary Illyes has confirmed that Penguin is now part of Google’s core algorithm in a post on the Official Google Webmaster Central blog.

This is the first time Google has updated the algorithm since Penguin 3.0 in October 2014.

The algorithm is “now more granular,” meaning that affected sites will disappear for certain keywords (or have certain pages disappear – we’ll have to wait and see which) rather than the whole website falling off the face of the earth, like this:

Penguin is now real-time. Illyes says

Historically, the list of sites affected by Penguin was periodically refreshed at the same time. Once a webmaster considerably improved their site and its presence on the internet, many of Google’s algorithms would take that into consideration very fast, but others, like Penguin, needed to be refreshed. With this change, Penguin’s data is refreshed in real time, so changes will be visible much faster, typically taking effect shortly after we recrawl and reindex a page. It also means we’re not going to comment on future refreshes.

This means several things.

Pretty much everyone should see some kind of recovery

Brands tend to “over-optimise” for certain keywords, which is likely what caused them to be affected by Penguin in the first place. This tends to refer to lots of anchor text links, especially links pointing to internal “commercial” pages – loads of “car insurance” anchor text to your /car-insurance page, for example.

Previous iterations of Penguin would effectively trash your whole website. This “more granular” version is likely to let other pages that don’t display the same spam signals return (your /life-insurance page, perhaps).

You can also probably recover a keyword by 404ing an affected page and putting a new one up without redirects. I’ll be testing that this week and will update as soon as we have results because…

It’s going to be weeks before we see the full impact

Let’s assume that core-algorithm Penguin runs in the same way as core-algorithm Panda, which seems to roll out every two weeks and take the full two weeks to roll out.

Those waiting to recover from Penguin shouldn’t get too disappointed if nothing has happened by Monday. It’ll probably be the first week of October before the dust starts to settle and we know who’s been affected and who’s recovered.

We’ll never hear about Penguin again

Google won’t mention Penguin again, except to deny its existence (although this update will give some SEOs a year’s worth of conference material).

@mihaiaperghis yes, which also means we’ll stop talking about it (or I will anyway) @rustybrick

— Gary Illyes (@methode) January 19, 2016

In future, the pattern will be as follows:

  1. Some sites won’t recover right now – because their owners haven’t put in the necessary work, perhaps – or some sites will be hit in future. It’ll be a few years before there are no sites left waiting for a Penguin recovery.
  2. SEOs will be monitoring the traffic of these sites (and rankings for as long as Google continues to let us), see a massive spike that could only mean a Penguin recovery, and head straight to the forums/Twitter.
  3. Google will deny a Penguin update within a few days.
  4. Several weeks later Google will reluctantly admit to updating the “core algorithm” – which Penguin is now part of.

Since Panda was baked into the core algorithm in January there have been several obvious algorithm changes (including in January itself) that saw big changes for sites affected by that algorithm.

I’m assuming that “baking” an algorithm into the core, apart from sounding delicious, effectively means replacing the previous algorithm with new infrastructure. I assume that Hummingbird replaced Caffeine in roughly the same way – it’s a newer, better way of doing roughly the same thing.

In the coming months we’re going to see days when an update has obviously taken place and certain sites previously affected by Penguin recover together – followed by an announcement that a core algorithm update has taken place.

This will signal what we used to call a Penguin “update”.

But we should never have to wait for a “refresh” again.

Further reading:

  • Dr. Pete has already posted some great analysis of the run-up to the current update (including that recent “core update” which looked a whole lot like Penguin).
  • Martin Woods posted some early thoughts on the update which I largely agree with (including contributions from Andrew Girdwood and Gerry White).

We published this a long time ago…

Some of the content in this post might be out of date, and some images and links may no longer work.

Discover who we are and how we may be able to help you today:

Learn more

Share this

  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)

More insights

AI isn’t going to take your job (unless you really want it to) 
Blog

AI isn’t going to take your job (unless you really want it to) 

By Edit | 18 Jun 2024
Customer relationship marketing: How generative AI is revolutionising engagement  
Blog

Customer relationship marketing: How generative AI is revolutionising engagement  

By Edit | 4 Apr 2024
Personalisation as a process
Blog

Personalisation as a process

By Edit | 8 Mar 2024
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Ts&Cs
  • Report a concern

© 2025 Edit, part of Salocin Group Ltd. All rights reserved. Company no.: 0362​4881. VAT no.: 4208​34911.

Salocin Group Certified B Corporation | Cyber Essentials Certified | British Assessment Bureau, ISO 27001 Information Security Management
Salocin Group
Your cookie preferences

We use cookies to ensure this website functions properly, to analyse website traffic and for marketing purposes.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}