Edit
Contact us
Salocin Group Leaders in data and AI-enabled connected customer experiences
Edit Engineers of connected customer experiences
Join the Dots Independent, data-led media thinking for sustainable growth
Wood for Trees Optimisers of future fundraising performance
  • Home
  • Our services
    • Cloud solutions
    • Data science
    • Modern Data Platform
    • Privacy and AI compliance
  • Our partners
    • Microsoft
    • Apteco
    • Salesforce
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Salocin Group
    • Careers
  • Contact Salocin Group
  • Home
  • Who we are
    • B Corp
    • Careers
  • Our work
  • What we do
    • Intelligent data
    • Marketing technology
    • Transformational CRM
    • Our technology partners
    • Privacy review
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • Contact Edit
  • Home
  • Broadcast media
  • Digital media
  • Print
    • Direct mail
  • Data
    • Our work with Herdify
    • EPiC
  • Media agency
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Join the Dots
    • Careers
  • Contact Join the Dots
  • Home
  • Services
    • Actionable insight
    • Data discovery
    • Data engineering
    • Data hygiene
    • Privacy review
  • Products
    • InsightHub
    • Apteco
    • Microsoft
    • Data management
    • Consent and preference management
  • Our insights
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Reports
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • About Wood for Trees
    • Operating principles
    • Careers
  • Contact Wood for Trees
Blog

Twitter scraps share counts in tweet buttons

By Edit | 28 Sep 2015

We published this a long time ago…

Some of the content in this post might be out of date, and some images and links may no longer work.

Discover who we are and how we may be able to help you today:

Learn more

Twitter just announced that it will be removing the share counters from its tweet buttons within the next month as the buttons are redesigned.

Twitter’s first redesign of share buttons since 2012 will remove share counts but not follower counts.

Chris Perkins wrote on Mashable:

“For larger publishers (including ​Mashable), who already have relationships with Gnip, Twitter’s data arm, nothing will change. Those companies and publishers will continue to be able to publish and glean share counts from share buttons and article links in real-time. It’s smaller publishers and individual sites that will be affected.

“These sites will need to engineer a new share count feature, using Twitter’s REST API, or by working with Gnip for gathering full-archive search counts.”

So this change shouldn’t have a huge effect on publications-as-media-companies like Mashable, but it could mean that the Slashdot effect will go the same way as Slashdot with “viral” campaigns potentially smaller than before: users won’t be peer-pressured into sharing content to the same degree.

The 2015 Edelman Media Forecast showed that 76% of journalists are now feeling more pressure to consider their story’s potential to be shared on social media: share counts are a key ingredient in the social proofing that propels a story across the net.

76% of all journalists don’t work at Mashable et al – local reporters feel many of the same pressures and this will undoubtedly cause problems for regional newspapers, with smaller newsrooms and a less advanced grasp of digital than their new media counterparts.

…and on Perkins’ point about engineering a new solution for share counts, developers would absolutely have to use the REST API; they would have to be able to get permissions to act on behalf of each user, requiring OAuth; and they would have to be prepared for Twitter to move the goalposts again at any time.

Implementing share counts on Twitter buttons after next month will likely require a business case – you can do much more productive things with your time, especially if your blog generally doesn’t get a lot of shares.

There’s no argument that the number of times a campaign is shared is a poor measure of success, but success isn’t the only thing that needs to be measured.

Share counts are a useful reference point for at-a-glance assessment of a potential PR placement, for example, and are one of the more informative metrics for occasions when a website’s analytics platform is off limits.

…but share counts can be – and are being – gamed like follower counts or links, and are only as useful as Domain Authority when judging a partner’s potential. At best, an indication – at worst, a red herring.

Will you miss share counts?

We published this a long time ago…

Some of the content in this post might be out of date, and some images and links may no longer work.

Discover who we are and how we may be able to help you today:

Learn more

Share this

  • Email
  • WhatsApp
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)

More insights

AI isn’t going to take your job (unless you really want it to) 
Blog

AI isn’t going to take your job (unless you really want it to) 

By Edit | 18 Jun 2024
Customer relationship marketing: How generative AI is revolutionising engagement  
Blog

Customer relationship marketing: How generative AI is revolutionising engagement  

By Edit | 4 Apr 2024
Personalisation as a process
Blog

Personalisation as a process

By Edit | 8 Mar 2024
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Ts&Cs
  • Report a concern

© 2025 Edit, part of Salocin Group Ltd. All rights reserved. Company no.: 0362​4881. VAT no.: 4208​34911.

Salocin Group Certified B Corporation | Cyber Essentials Certified | British Assessment Bureau, ISO 27001 Information Security Management
Salocin Group
Your cookie preferences

We use cookies to ensure this website functions properly, to analyse website traffic and for marketing purposes.

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}